• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
CDM Archive

CDM Archive

Discipleship Ministries of the PCA

  • Bookstore
  • CDM Resources
  • Donate to CDM

Archives

Does the Sunday School Have a Bright Future?

November 1, 2001 by Editor

By Elmer Towns. Sunday school is facing some of the most serious challenges of its life. Attendance is down, it’s hard to recruit teachers and those who volunteer don’t want to spend time in training and planning. Facilities are inadequate and out of date. Most churches have few teaching resources and little money to buy up-to-date aids. And it hasn’t even thought about the computer, Internet, PowerPoint presentations or moving into the 21st Century electronically.

Attendance seems to be down in most Sunday schools and up in a few. Dry lectures seem to be out, while enjoyable learning activities are in. However, can we build a biblical Sunday school by just making it fun? According to one observer, “The more enjoyable we make Sunday school, the fewer children seem to attend.”

Some pastors are concerned because they can’t get new visitors or new Christians into Sunday school classes, and faithful attenders of the past seem to drop out as they get older. Sunday school busing, which was a dominant outreach thirty years ago, no longer seems effective; nor can we get people to attend Sunday school with contests or campaigns. Not as many care about having the largest banana split in the city or being called the fastest growing Sunday school in their county. There are no new gimmicks on the horizon to re-vitalize Sunday school. However, as Sunday school is changing, let’s examine the change to see how we can turn some of these negatives into positives. Let’s see if we can find some diamonds in the coal mine and turn obstacles into wheels for prayer.

1.Sunday school is changing from being the steeple of the church to its foundation. The steeple is the most visible part of the church, and so, in the past, the Sunday school was visible in its campaigns, buses, and systematic visitations carried on by teachers. But Sunday schools no longer attract a larger attendance than the morning worship service.

As a matter of fact, the average worship service attendance has more than 25 percent larger attendance than the Sunday school. Visitors do not usually attend Sunday school; usually they attend the morning service. Let’s turn this obstacle into a wheel of progress. After visitors attend the worship service, let’s recruit them into Sunday school classes where they are grounded in Bible teaching and Christian living. Let’s make the Sunday school of the future the foundation of the church that becomes the place where believers are grounded in doctrine and godly living.

The year 1971 seemed to be the transitional year when worship attendance passed Sunday school attendance. Sociologists call this a tip-point. Prior to that year, Sunday school attendance was larger. It seemed that many pastors were constantly encouraging people to remain for the morning service. Now, we must reverse the process. Pastors must motivate people to come early next week for Sunday school.

The old Sunday school adage is still true. Everyone who comes to Sunday school ought to stay for church. Those who come to church ought to come early enough for Sunday school. There is a place for both in both, and if both are not in both, there is something wrong with both.

2.Sunday school is changing from the reaching arm to the nurturing arm of the church. Traditionally, Sunday school is by defined by four points; (a) the reaching arm, (b) the teaching arm, (c) the winning arm, and (d) the nurturing or maturing arm of the church. As such, the Sunday school of the past has had a strong evangelistic outreach, primarily through Sunday school busing and Sunday school campaigns. When I used to ask a church audience how many were won to Christ through Sunday school, many hands went up. Today, less than 10 percent say that the Sunday school was influential in bringing them to Christ. Sunday school is no longer thought of as an evangelistic outreach for the church. Also, teachers do not perceive their primary role as evangelists; and not many have a burden to win their pupils to Christ. They perceive themselves as educators.

The Sunday school should not throw in the towel on evangelism. Recently, I conducted a survey of 649 adults at a Sunday school convention. I asked them to respond with a show of hands how many were converted through the influence of media, i.e., preaching the gospel by TV, radio, magazines, tracts, billboards, etc. Two percent lifted their hands. Then I asked how many were converted through the ministry of a pastor. Six percent raised their hands. Next, I asked how many were saved through the organized evangelistic outreach of the church. This included organized visitation, street meetings, intentional evangelism, etc. Again, six percent lifted their hands. When I asked how many were saved through the influence of a friend or relative, more than 80 percent lifted their hands. Sunday school can be an effective evangelistic outreach when members will network their friends into a Bible study group where they can hear the Word of God and be saved. Then as a result of life-style evangelism and the follow-up of class members, these people are not only won to Jesus Christ, but bonded to a church through the Sunday school. Hence, the Sunday school is becoming the nurturing arm for bonding people to the church and Christ.

3.Sunday school is changing from front door to side door evangelism. Front door evangelism is inviting people into the church where they can hear the gospel and be converted. This is also called inviting evangelism or it implies event evangelism. This means people are converted as a result of a sermon or a Sunday school lesson. Statistics reveal that front door evangelism is not nearly as effective as relationship evangelism. But don’t completely rule out front door evangelism, some will get saved. However, as Americans become more concerned about their relationship to one another, side door evangelism can network friends to the gospel through classes, cell groups, and special ministries for the retarded, the deaf, the divorced, the single parents or other people with special needs in the church. The key is to find hurting people and offer them help. Side door evangelism is reaching people through special ministry to their needs.

The churchwide evangelistic crusades of the fifties and the sixties were a successful means of getting people to Christ. Today, outreach must be personalized and specialized. People can be brought under the influence of the gospel through ladies’ Bible studies, recreational teams sponsored by the church, special seminars aimed at the needs of people and fellowship groups. Sunday school can reflect specialized outreach by including some special purpose classes (in addition to the graded classes).

4.Sunday school is changing from its image of children only to a balanced ministry to children and adults. Before 1971, 39 percent of the Sunday school population were adults. But this has changed. Today more than 51 percent of the Sunday school population are adults. You can no longer think of Sunday school as only a place for flannelgraph stories for children. You must think of it as a place for adult Bible classes and fellowship groups. In the tip-point year of 1971, adult attendance finally passed children in the Sunday school population. Now that there are more adults, we should not minimize our emphasis to children but balance our endeavors to reach and teach both children and adults.

One way to balance the outreach to children and adults is to evaluate our resources. The average Sunday school invests 70 to 80 percent of its budget, staff, and educational space on children, yet adults represent 51 percent of its population. Let’s do more with adults, but not minimize our efforts to children.

At a Sunday school convention in North Carolina, I asked approximately four hundred pastors their opinion as to what age group in their Sunday school was growing. Only six pastors indicated that their Sunday schools were growing because of children. Six pastors indicated that their Sunday schools were growing because of youth. Only four pastors said their Sunday schools were growing because of senior saints’ ministries. However, more than two hundred pastors indicated that their churches were growing in the young adult area. While that is both important and wonderful, approximately two hundred said their Sunday schools were not growing.

Young adults, ages eighteen to thirty, have been considered a hard age to reach with the gospel. However, a recent sociological survey studied the many changes that young adults are going through. While changes sometime hurt church attendance, there is the other side. When people go through changes, they are open to the gospel. These transitions make young adults receptive and responsive to the gospel. These changes include choosing a college, choosing a life partner, choosing a place to live after college, choosing a job, and deciding to have children. Usually the change-process starts over as they assume new jobs and new homes. The research by Flavil Yeakley reveals that during this time a large number of young adults will attend church and be impacted with the gospel.

Growth-oriented Sunday schools that want to reach young adults should create special classes for them. New young adult classes, unlike established classes, produce growth; and remember, it is difficult for new members to penetrate into older fellowship circles.

In a recent study of why people choose a Sunday school class, it was shown that they first looked for fellowship, or they wanted to attend with friends. Second, they go where they can receive specific help for a heartfelt need. In the third place, they choose a Sunday school class because of a topic for discussion. The fourth place was the personality of the teacher, and the fifth was because of specific teaching techniques, such as films or discussion groups.

5.Sunday school is changing from an instructional center to a shepherding ministry. Many are recruited as Sunday school teachers because of their love for teaching. However, if education were the only objective of the Sunday school, then a teacher who communicates Bible content can rightly feel that when his pupils know the lesson, he/she has finished the task. However, Sunday schools have a much broader objective than education. They have a shepherding task that must be carried out. A Sunday school teacher is a shepherd; he/she is the extension of pastoral ministry into the life of the pupils. Everything the pastor is to the larger church flock, the Sunday school teacher is to the Sunday school flock.

When a Sunday school teacher gets a burden to shepherd pupils rather than just instructing them in biblical content, he or she will be transformed in passion and purpose. A shepherd is first of all a leader or an example to the flock. His life modeling influence will do more to communicate the gospel than simply telling Bible stories. Secondly, a shepherd tends or protects the sheep, which involves the ministry of counseling, visiting absentees, and making oneself available to talk about their problems. When a Sunday school pupil backslides, a teacher/shepherd goes to restore them. A teacher/shepherd has a ministry of intercession for his/her pupils. It was Jimmy Breland, a Sunday school teacher at the Eastern Heights Presbyterian Church in Savannah, Georgia, who cared enough to come by and take me to Sunday school in his truck. He was a shepherd for my soul.

6.Sunday school is changing from Bible lectures to Bible study. The key to the healthy Sunday school is Bible study with fellowship. Most think of an adult class teacher as a deacon who lectures to a class of adults in the back of the church auditorium underneath the balcony, speaking in a monotone for thirty-five minutes, then asking, “Are there any questions?” When there are no questions, the deacon dismisses for the morning service. This typical class will not make it in the future, nor will it prepare pupils for the future.

Recently, my wife attended a Sunday school class of forty-three adults in the family room of a home in a subdivision in Modesto, California. The class was studying Melchizedek? The people entered through the kitchen, got coffee, and found a place in the family room. Even before the class officially began, they were sharing what they had found out about Melchizedek. Although a simple topic, it motivated many students to research Melchizedek’s character and duties. The class had a lively discussion by many individuals before the teacher finally stood to begin giving his thoughts. My wife said it was an outstanding class because everyone shared. Everyone was interested.

The modern adult Sunday school class must have three things. First, a coffee pot (cold drinks or juice for younger people) Not that the refreshments attract visitors, but coffee allows people to fellowship before class begins and promotes informality that leads to sharing during the class. Second, modern adult classes need an overhead projector that allows people to see an outline, read a question, or focus their attention on the topic. This electronic teaching aid is a modern tool that reaches young adults who are a product of the electronic generation. Third, there must be questions to stimulate thoughts, discussion and involvement. Even Jesus used questions in his teaching. The difference between mediocrity and success in teaching is involvement by the student in the learning process, and a good question will get involvement.

7.Sunday school is changing from emphasis on enrollment to the open hand of fellowship. There was a time in the past when enrollment figures were some of the most important statistics in a Sunday School. As a matter of record, most teachers told visitors that if they attended for three weeks in a row, their name would be placed on the roll book. Enrollment was an important figure; it was gathered and carefully kept by Sunday school secretaries and reported annually for denominational records. Enrollment meant that the pupil belonged to the Sunday school and was accepted into its ranks. Today, many of the major denominations and independent churches have stopped gathering and reporting enrollment figures (except the Southern Baptists, who use it as a vital technique in their outreach). Most Sunday schools offer an open hand of fellowship to anyone who visits the class and try to make him or her feel as much a part of the class on their first visit as any other member. The open hand approach indicates that anyone who attends is a first-class member, just as much as the person who has been there for ten years.

Perhaps the change in American society is reflected in the change of attitude toward Sunday school enrollment. Most people do not make long-term commitments to bowling teams, service clubs, or hobby groups. Most Americans make short-term commitments, so they don’t ask others for long-term commitments. Like fast foods and instant everything, people become instant members of a class the first time they attend. As a matter of fact, the most important use of enrollment is that it becomes a mailing list for follow-up and for contact with absentees rather than a means of identifying those who belong to a Sunday school.

8.Sunday school can’t use yesterday’s tools in today’s world and be in ministry tomorrow. Some things such as our commitment to God and His Word must never change, while other things constantly change. The mature believer must know what things to cling to, and what things to give up. The Word of God never changes, and Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever. We must never compromise biblical principles. But programs can change because they represent a technique used to reach people through the meeting of their needs. When a person’s perception of his need changes, the church must use a new program to reach a person through the new need in his life.

The biblical principles of preaching, teaching, soul winning, and ministry never change. But programs and techniques change. The original Sunday school was conducted on Sunday afternoon and taught reading, writing, and arithmetic. Now since public schools teach these topics, Sunday school no longer meets basic educational needs of reading, writing, and arithmetic. Public attitudes have changed toward Sunday afternoons, so it is difficult to attract people to Sunday school in the afternoon. Most Sunday schools are held on Sunday mornings. So, Sunday school programs change, but the biblical principles that make Sunday school essential have not changed.

The wise Sunday school leader will test all things by the Word of God. Some programs have served their usefulness; they should no longer receive priority treatment. Other new programs arise and demand attention. Remember the words of Longfellow, “Be not the first by which the new is tried, be not the last by which the old is laid aside.” New programs are not good just because they are new and old programs are useless just because they are old. Paul tells us, “Test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thess. 5:21). Therefore, hold fast to biblical principles, for they are eternal, then test all programs by biblical principles for effectiveness.

Does the Sunday school have a bright future? Its historic purpose must not change. The Sunday school must reach, teach, win, and mature its pupils in Christ. As long as the Sunday school remains a channel for the Word of God, it will meet needs and have a future. As long as the Sunday school curriculum is based on the Word of God, people must attend its classes and support its programs. As long as the Sunday school is based on the Word of God, it has a bright future.

Filed Under: Church Leadership Tagged With: Church Leadership, Teachers/Disciplers

Building a Healthy Church is our Aim

November 1, 2001 by Charles

Welcome to the final 2001 issue of Equip for Ministry. This has been an eventful year for our nation and our denomination. Though the Presbyterian Church in America extends beyond the United States into Canada, and though we have missionaries in more than fifty countries, this year has had particular impact on the U. S. The events of September 11, have had a ripple effect throughout the world and have demonstrated that in our “global village” you cannot touch one part of the system without impacting another. Yet our country was especially severely tried.

On a less challenging and non-threatening note, the Atlanta based PCA offices moved to a new location about twenty-five miles northeast of the city. To make that move and to adjust quickly without interrupting our ministries was not an easy feat, but the transition went rather smoothly.

In the July/August issue we addressed the local church education program. We are grateful for the positive comments, even those who chastised us for not mentioning the Christian school movement. (Though that is part of a wholistic emphasis of Christian education, it was not our intention to cover it in that article.) This issue further develops that theme with a specific focus on Sunday school.

The lead article was written by our friend Elmer Towns. Towns understands the trends in local church ministry. In the September/October 2000 issue, we reviewed Into the Future a book which he co-authored dealing with significant trends changing the face of ministry. He has participated in CE&P programs relating to the Sunday school, and the lead article contains many of the ideas he presented at our last conference. I hope that each of you particularly leaders and teachers will read the article carefully. The Sunday school has been a powerful tool in local church ministries for several hundred years. Some say that there is no biblical warrant for Sunday school; yet God has used this part of the church’s life to reach and disciple many children, youth, and adults. A Sunday school that is done well will contribute much to the church’s overall ministry, but as with other programs, it can be done poorly or ineffectively and distract from the church’s ministry.

This article contains much to think about, particularly whether Sunday school is still a viable program for our church or has outlived its effectiveness. Historically the Sunday school was used to reach out to the unchurched children. We in the Reformed faith have had a difficult time knowing how to do that effectively through the Sunday school; hence we have used it as an important teaching time for families in the church.

Towns underscores the four traditional purposes of the Sunday school: reaching, teaching, winning, and nurturing. I believe those are still valid purposes but as the article suggests, we must do them differently if we are going to reach this generation.

The Changeless Truths article addresses the vitally important issue of seizing the moment to turn tragedy into triumph. It will also pave the way for a lead article on Islam by our friend and brother Dr. Anees Zaka in the January/February issue.Please carefully read the book review section in this issue, especially the book by Jerram Barrs. It will dovetail with the lead and Changeless Truths articles. Never has it been as important as it is today, particularly because of the postmodern paradigm, to believe, understand, and stand for the truth and to witness to that truth in the most personal and relational manner possible. Christians must be bridge builders and not isolate or wall ourselves off from our surroundings. Christ’s command to make disciples was given to “the church” and we must not fail to carry out his Great Commission.

Filed Under: Church Leadership Tagged With: Church Leadership, Teachers/Disciplers

Willing to Change for the Better

September 1, 2001 by Bob

Fresh off another stint in Vacation Bible School, I’ve found myself reflecting on the week. I heard children recite verses – some lengthy sections from Philippians 2. I listened to our four-year-old granddaughter sing the songs in the afternoons. I watched child after child participate enthusiastically. And almost everybody was there every day-including a large number from outside the church.Could we transplant some of that enthusiasm into the Sunday school?

Before you say it’s different, bear with me. If we are going to reach this generation it will require more than tweaking a few things. We must rethink everything. That requires imagination, creativity with dependence on and direction from our God.

So, if you’re willing, ask some questions. Have you had a kid’s ministry effort that really worked? Why? Can some of those ingredients be incorporated into a program that’s struggling? Or maybe it’s time to stop doing one thing so that you can try another that might be more effective. Underscore the word “might.” You must have the courage to change, which is no small thing, particularly if you fear messing with success. Because you might fail, and then you will have to try again. Where and how will the Spirit work?

Back to Sunday school. What about breaks between the quarters or even a semester system with a lengthy hiatus? That way it doesn’t just keep going, and it can begin again with a fresh burst of energy.What about lengthening the time frame? That also means enlarging your staff to include special activities. What would it take to have a great time of singing? To focus on learning significant sections of the Bible? To have some fun time?

Is it possible to revive the attendance drives that were part of many Sunday schools years ago? That will require challenging programs for adults as well as kids-no small order. But the possible result is families beginning to attend church together and perhaps discovering for the first time the life-changing message of the gospel.Could you try Sunday school at a different time?And what about your teenagers? I saw a number of them taking on adult responsibilities last summer. Could their role in Sunday school be enlarged?

Hopefully I’ve raised enough issues to get you thinking. What you’re doing now may be effective. How can you make it more effective? Or you might have to stretch to justify it. What can you do with it to begin making a difference in the lives of those in your church and your community?

Filed Under: Children, Church Leadership Tagged With: Children's Ministries, Church Leadership, Teachers/Disciplers

A Strategy for Evangelizing the Post Modern

September 1, 2001 by Editor

By William J. Larkin. Postmodernism is the worldview of the dawning age, the environment forming for twenty-first century civilization. It is the mind-set embodied in the young, playful postmodern M.D. content to practice medicine a limited number of hours at a “Doc in a Box” instead of building up his own practice because he wants “time” to pursue his own interests, his “play.” It is the environment we live in, when, moving at the speed of light, we can experience, at a distance, events in “real time” in a place called “cyber-space,” which is actually nowhere.

This forms a worldview which impacts how we understand and receive the gospel. Indeed, how can we communicate a gospel that is truly “good news” to the postmodern person (or any cultural being for that matter)? We must “exegete” the culture from the inside out. We must interpret the Scriptures at a metacultural level. Then, we must bring the two together in effective gospel communication. After describing the shift to postmodernism, which is occurring all around us-exegeting our culture-and understanding the good news at its most fundamental level, we will illustrate how the two may be brought together.

Exegeting the Culture: Postmodernism

What is postmodernism? Originally, this label applied to a movement in western architecture which moved away from the boxy, modernist, glass and steel functionalism of the first half of the twentieth century to an eclectic, decorative, and more humane style. Since the 1980s, however, it has come to describe a broader cultural shift away from modernism, the worldview characterizing western civilization since the eighteenth century Enlightenment. Though some see postmodernism as modernism reaching its logical extreme, a hyper-modernism, most believe “post” points to a worldview distinct from modernism. Not only is it chronologically “post,” it is “post” in the sense of critique, for it claims to supersede and replace modernism.

So fundamental and comprehensive is the shift postmodernism brings, we must keep in mind certain basic worldview categories if we are to understand what is happening.The postmodern thinker has turned away from modernist views of the nature of the universe and reality and how we relate to them, and the nature of humans, language, and text.Postmodernism is not a passing fad but the dawning age of twenty-first century western civilization. A postmodern environment is not a cultural context of an isolated intellectual elite. It is the cultural context forming around us. Postmodern types of individuals are already walking onto the stage of history. We work and play with them. They may even sit across from us at the dinner table.

Postmodern: The Dawning Age

We know that the postmodern age is the dawning age, when we observe that under the weight of history and experience the “Modernist Project” is collapsing. Themes of the modernist “grand narrative”-this worldview’s explanatory myth of origin, power and destiny-have been discredited. Hence, there is an openness to viewing reality differently.

From Closed to Open. In science for example, postmodernism has demonstrated that we do not live in a self-contained, closed universe where all change is simply a rearrangement of eternally existent phenomena. Rather, we inhabit an open universe which began with a “Big Bang” and is continually expanding to an uncertain end. Will our universe know eternally emergent evolution? Or, is the universe headed for an evitable cold, empty, starless night in which proton decay means matter’s last gasp?

From Totalizing to Deconstruction. Modernism’s reductionistic and totalizing approach to explaining reality involved the penchant for declaring one of its features the basic building block which explained everything. For example, Marx’s materialistic economics of class struggle claimed to explain all events of human history. Yet, experience and history in the twentieth century have discredited one totalizing explanation after another, because when each was given full reign in society, it created the exact opposite of its ideal. Marxism was to bring about the progressive emancipation of labor. That ideal died in the streets of Budapest in 1956, if not before, in Stalin’s purges of the thirties. Indeed, the twentieth century totalitarian regimes of the left and the right, and their attendant atrocities, give evidence that the “Modern Project” has failed to find a basis for morality and society.

From Purpose to Play. Modernism believed in the inevitability of progress, the improvement of all humanity through the advances of capitalist techno-science. A trip to Disney World and the Epcot Center lets you experience this quintessential modern ideal-science and technology meeting all your needs and wants, titillating your senses and firing your imagination.

From Metaphysics to Irony. Sobered by the use of science in the creation of weapons of mass destruction and realizing the potential of scientific advances for evil, as well as good, postmoderns reject the modern belief in the inherent goodness of knowledge. They are not convinced that the progressive emancipation of reason and freedom is humankind’s destiny. This was the German ideal, the most erudite people in the modern western world. And where did that erudition and incarnation of the “inherent goodness of knowledge” reach its climax? In the experiments of Auschwitz. No wonder the postmodern turns from a pursuit of knowledge, which confidently constructs a metaphysic, to a quizzical, if not cynical, exercise in irony.

From Christianity to Spirituality. Though the “Modernist Project” with its closed, self-contained universe and its human-centered ideals of progress and improvement actually has no room for biblical Christianity, still the Christian faith was the dominant religion of modern Europe and North America. The postmodern historical critique casts its penetrating light on modern Christianity. Here is the indictment of Jean-Fran

Filed Under: Church Leadership, Men, Seniors, Women, Youth Tagged With: Church Leadership, Men's Ministries, Seniors' Ministries, Teachers/Disciplers, Women's Ministries, Youth Ministries

A Preaching and Teaching Church

September 1, 2001 by Charles

Welcome! As we prepare this issue, we are in the process of moving to the new PCA office building. By the time you receive the magazine, we are hopeful that we will have made the transition and will be getting settled in a way that will enable us to continue the ministry of the CE&P bookstore, video library, training, consulting, and other services.

We live at an extremely crucial moment in history. If historians and sociologists like Sorokin, Strauss, and Howe are correct that there are identifiable cyclical patterns in history, then we are obviously at a low point morally and spiritually. They generally concur that in the past when things have bottomed out, there has been a return to a more stable conservative period. While we hold to a linear view of history, there are obvious cyclical patterns. If we are bottoming out, then we could be hopeful about the future.

The rising generation of young people is showing a definite interest in a more conservative approach to life and a greater interest in spirituality; yet their interest in spirituality is not necessarily connected with Christianity. While this is a both good news and bad news, it is a great opportunity to set forth the Christian faith.

I have been reading a collection of articles by men in reformed circles. While I appreciate the many good things in the book, I was extremely disappointed by one article that states that the only way we are going to change things is by “the preaching of the gospel.” The author’s point is that education does not really change anything. This is disappointing because in the Reformed family we have always combined preaching the gospel with Christian education. The tragedy of today’s younger generation, even those who have professed to believe in Jesus, is that they have not always been trained to think, act, and live biblically. Often they have been given a faith without substance. We see the fallout as we look at families, churches, and culture in general. Teens are dropping out of church in alarming numbers.

Recently a mother shared with me the difficulty her family is experiencing with their older teenage son who had dropped out of church. She asked, “What can we do?” My first response to her was that she should not assume that by dropping out of church he has turned his back on God. There was a time when that might have been the case, and still may be in some situations; however, many teenagers simply are not convinced that the church is that relevant, necessary, or important to them. We are faced with a tremendous challenge and simplistic answers will not suffice.

Dr. William Larkin, a PCA teaching elder and professor at Columbia International University, recently worked with our regional trainer/consultants. He has written an article on the postmodern philosophical world view, and we have condensed his material to use as the lead article in this issue. Do not fail to read it! He has some valuable insights. His point is well taken, and it is clearly demonstrable that we are immersed in this postmodern culture. It forms the setting or environment in which we live, especially in North America. We see its effects in every phase of our lives, and we need to understand it and its results.

While we believe strongly in the providence of God, we know that postmodernism is not an accident of history to be taken lightly. It can and will serve a purpose; but we must understand what it is and how to take a system so obviously anti-Christian (because it is anti-truth) and know how to use it to build God’s Kingdom.

We must preach the Gospel, but we must not create a dichotomy between preaching the Gospel and teaching all things whatsoever the Lord has commanded. That is God’s way of making disciples. We have not improved the process by divorcing one from the other. One thing that disappointed me about the article in the collection mentioned earlier was that the author is known as a church historian and has written some good things. How does the study of history relate to preaching the Gospel? Should we not study church history? Isn’t that a part of the education process? We must be students of the Word and of the world in order to serve God’s purpose of communicating his Word to this generation. The Apostle Paul preached the Gospel, but he preached it to his audience and in their context. So must we.

This issue also includes reviews of several books that are valuable in the education process. And if you would like to study the topic of philosophical worldview shift further, our staff can recommend helpful books. Let us not miss this moment of opportunity by being unconcerned or unprepared for the challenge.

Filed Under: Church Leadership Tagged With: Church Leadership, Teachers/Disciplers

QUESTIONS?!

July 1, 2001 by Bob

A man in our congregation gave this testimony: He and his wife had visited various churches with their questions. But no one seemed to listen until they began attending a small group where their questions were welcomed.

That experience is not unique. I’ve had questions all my life. And questions lead to deeper questions-often about things viewed as basic, incontrovertible.My daughter, Holly, has always raised questions (maybe it’s in the genes). It hurt her in school. Many, if not most teachers are impatient with questions, possibly threatened by them. I studied under two of the foremost Christian thinkers of the twentieth century. Neither one dealt well with questions-especially ones that might challenge their perspectives. However, there is always the exception. Emily Gray, who is now with the Lord, was one of the most gifted teachers I have known. She taught Holly. And she loved the questions. Unanswered questions don’t go away, especially the ones never raised, never addressed.

A Sunday school teacher once asked class members to name their favorite holiday. A great get acquainted activity. One lady, new to the group, said, “Halloween.” There was a collective gasp. She never returned.Let’s speculate a little. Perhaps a few others in the group identified with the woman’s sentiments. Would they raise a question? Probably not. Would their thinking change? It’s doubtful. Those who disagreed with the group would quietly continue to hold their own ideas. If they discovered enough disagreements they might leave the group and drift away from the church without anyone knowing why.

A number of years ago I taught a senior high class. One Sunday I was talking about how we know we’re Christians and for some reason I locked in on a young man who was a student at an outstanding Christian school and whose parents were faithful in the church. I wanted him to tell me how he knew he was a Christian but the responses were vague at best so I kept pressing him. Finally he said, “I’m not sure I’m a Christian and I’m not sure I want to be.” Could such a question be raised in your setting without that collective gasp? Without a teacher being unnerved?

There are deep-seated differences in this society about politics, education and morality. Many differences exist even in the Christian community. We tend to respond to those differences in one of two ways. Either we identify with groups where virtually everyone thinks like we do, or we bury our questions. Neither is particularly helpful. Our thinking needs to be challenged. Our values, even those we cherish the most, need to be evaluated. Our faith must be examined lest we find ourselves losing that which we claim is most dear.So when the questions come – even the ones with hostile overtones – take them seriously. It could be God’s way of providing answers for all those involved.

Filed Under: Church Leadership, Men, Women, Youth Tagged With: Men's Ministries, Teachers/Disciplers, Women's Ministries, Youth Ministries

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 90
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Archives

Accessing the Archive

Below is an extensive archive of book reviews, articles, blog posts, news clips, etc., from the archives of CDM (formerly Christian Education and Publications) of the Presbyterian Church in America.

Choose the category below or search the site, above.

Categories

Copyright © 2025 · Presbyterian Church in America Committee on Discipleship Ministries